Mutual Funds Mythbuster:
Rahul is working for a
mutual fund house. They have recently came out with an NFO (new fund offer).
The day on which the fund house announced its maiden NAV (net asset value),
he received lot of calls from investors asking why the NAV is at below par.
They thought something was wrong.
Then Rahul went on
clarifying them that though both an equity fund and a stock extend
market-related returns, there are some key differences between the two. If
you have similar misconceptions about equity funds and stocks, this article
will demystify all those misconceptions.
New Fund Offerings:
A new fund offer is not
likely to generate amazing returns as can be the case with an initial public
offering from a company.
This is because the NAV
reflects the market value of the stocks held by the fund on any day. Because
a fund holds several stocks in its portfolio, the NAV can only reflect the
combined returns on the portfolio between the NFO date and the date of first
NAV.
The first NAV declared by
a fund can, at times, be lower than the par value of investment. A lower NAV
does not mean a cheaper fund: Just because a New Fund is issued at Rs 10, it
does not mean it has a chance of giving better returns than an existing fund
that has a higher NAV.
Whether the scheme in
which you are planning to invest has an NAV of Rs.15 or Rs.150 does not
matter at all.
There is a difference
between the price of a listed security and the NAV of a mutual fund scheme.
Listed security has a price, determined by the demand and supply of the
security. Whereas the unit's NAV of the scheme has a value determined
mathematically, by the prices of the securities in the portfolio. If the
portfolio appreciates by 10% Rs.15 NAV will become RS.16.5 and Rs.150 AV
will become Rs.165. So in whatever the NAV you invest your investment will
fetch you 10% return.
So instead of
concentrating on LOW NAV and more number of units, it is worthwhile to
consider other factors (performance track record, fund management,
volatility) that determine the portfolio return.
A fund with higher NAV
may give higher returns than a lower NAV fund, if its stocks did better in
the markets.
Funds Vs Stocks
Point of
distinction
|
Equity Fund
|
Stocks
|
Level of Risk
|
High
|
Highest
|
Entry/Exit cost
|
No Entry Load; But
there will be Exit load. Advisory fee may be applicable.
|
Demat a\c and
Brokerage charges
|
Options
|
Options available
like dividend payout, dividend reinvestment, growth.
|
No such options
|
Minimum Investment
|
Min investment is
usually Rs.5000.
|
Even one share can
be bought.
|
Measuring
Performance
|
Returns Vs
Benchmark
|
Net Profit
margins/EPS
|
Sub-division
|
Classified based
on stocks in which it invests. (Diversified, Midcap, sectoral,
thematic)
|
Classified as per
the industry in which it operates.(FMCG, IT, PSU, METAL)
|
Pricing
|
Based on the price
of the underlying securities
|
Based on the
demand and supply of the particular stock
|
Dividends are not extra
returns:
Immediately, after the dividend payment of
dividend the NAV of the fund will fall to the extent of the dividend
payment. Let us illustrate.
Fund’s cum dividend NAV is Rs.25. Proposed
dividend is 50%. You are investing Rs.1 Lac and you will not get Rs.50000 as
dividend. It is only Rs.20000 (50% on the face value Rs.10 is Rs.5 per unit)
as the unit price is Rs.25 you will get 4000 units. Rs.5 dividend * 4000
units=Rs.20000.
And this dividend is not an additional gain
or income. After payment of dividend the NAV of the scheme will fall to the
extent of the payment and distribution taxes (if applicable). Now your nav
will become Rs.20 and your investment value will be Rs.80000 (4000 units *
Rs.20 NAV).
In a nutshell,
Investment amount Rs.1,00,000
Dividend amount Rs. 20,000
Present Value Rs. 80,000
It is nothing but investing Rs.80000 after
dividend distribution at NAV Rs.20.
So investing in a scheme
because it is declaring dividend in the near future is meaningless.
Usually a company with a
liberal dividend policy may enjoy greater investor interest in the stock
market. The same is not applicable to an equity-oriented mutual fund.
Investing
more number of funds is not actual diversification. It may reduce your
return.
Owning several mutual funds doesn’t
necessarily broaden your holdings. It will be a mistake to buy the same
securities over and over again in different funds with different names. You
tend to believe they're diversified. But it is not real diversification.
There are only very few funds which are
performing consistently. Instead of investing in few funds, if someone
chooses to invest in more number of funds (because he intends to diversify)
he may be forced to choose some average performing schemes also. As a result
his returns will be diluted. The step taken by the investor to diversify his
investment is not leading to diversification but to dilution of return.
Thus ideally your portfolio should not have
more than four-five funds.
NO tax for churning:
When we buy shares and
sell them within a year we are accountable for short term capital gain tax
at the rate of 15%.
But mutual funds provide
the benefit of churning of stocks with no tax implications.
A fund which churns its portfolio within a year is
exempt from tax because it only redistributes these profits to investors.
The
author is
Ramalingam K,
an MBA
(Finance) and Certified Financial Planner.
He is the Founder and Director of
Holistic Investment Planners (www.holisticinvestment.in)
a firm that offers Financial Planning and Wealth Management. He can be
reached at
ramalingam@holisticinvestment.in.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to drop your comments and suggestions