instructions on Regularization of Unauthorized Absence.
As per Rule 25 of CCS (Leave) Rules 1972:
- Unless the authority competent to grant
leave extends the leave, a Government servant who remains absent after the
end of leave is entitled to no leave salary for the period of such absence
and that periodshall be debited against leave account as though it were half
pay leave, to the extent such leave is due, the period in excess of such
leave due being treated as extraordinary leave. - Willful absence from duty after the expiry
of leave renders a Government servant liable to disciplinary action.
Government of India decisions also exists that a Government Servant who
remains absent without any authority should be proceeded against immediately
and this should not be put off till the absence exceeds the limit prescribed
in Rule 32(2) (a) of the CCS (Leave) Rules, 1972. - It is once again stressed that a Govt.
servant who remains absent without any authority should be proceeded against
immediately. Ministries/Departments are requested to ensure that in all
cases of unauthorized absence by a Government Servant, he should be informed
of the consequences of such absence and be directed to rejoin duty
immediately within a specified date, say within three days, failing which he
would be liable: for disciplinary action under CCS(CCA) Rules 1965. If the
Government Servant does not join duty by the stipulated date the
Disciplinary Authority should initiate disciplinary action against him and
the disciplinary case should be conducted and concluded as quickly as
possible. - It is only due to apathy of the
Disciplinary Authorities that the situation arises where long pending
unauthorized absence leads to delay in other service matters of Government
Servants, including promotions. To avoid such situations all Ministries
Departments should advise Disciplinary Authorities to ensure that prompt
action is taken against Government Servants who absent themselves with out
permission and that Charge-Sheets are issued without delay. - The consequences and procedure to be
followed in respect of an officer who is absent from duty without any
authority has been brought out under FR 17(1 ) and 17-A. As per FR 17-A(iii)
without prejudice to the provisions of Rule 27 of the Central Civil Services
(Pension) Rules, 1972, remaining absent without any authority or deserting
the post, shall be deemed to cause an interruption or break in the service
of the employee, unless otherwise decided by the competent authority for the
purpose of leave travel concession, quasi-permanency and eligibility for
appearing in deparment examinations, for which a minimum period of
continuous service is required. - Comptroller and Auditor General have issued
orders that the period of absence not covered by grant of leave shall have
to be treated as “dies non” for all purpose; viz., increment, leave and
pension. Such absence without leave where it stands singly and not in
continuation of any authorized leave of absence will constitute an
interruption of service for the purpose of pension and unless the pension
sanctioning authority exercise its powers under Article 421, Civil Service
Regulations [now Rule 27 of the CCS (pension) Rules] to treat the period as
leave without allowance, the entire past service will stand forfeited. - It may be noted that regularization of
unauthorized absence for pension purpose is to be considered under the CCS
(Pension) Rules. Only in cases where the disciplinary authority is satisfied
that the grounds adduced for unauthorized absence are justified, the leave
of the kind applied for and due and admissible may be granted to him under
the CCS (Leave) Rules.
Office Memorandum No. 13026 /3/20 LO-Estt. ( Leave) dated 22.06.2010
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to drop your comments and suggestions